What is meant by epistemic violence?

Epistemic violence is a failure of an audience to communicatively. reciprocate, either intentionally or unintentionally, in linguistic exchanges. owning to pernicious ignorance. Pernicious ignorance is a reliable ignorance or. a counterfactual incompetence that, in a given context, is harmful.

Who coined epistemic violence?

Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
Epistemic violence is a concept introduced to postcolonial studies by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak in her influential essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988, see also ch. 5).

How does Spivak conceptualize the notion of epistemic violence in characterizing the subaltern?

In that essay, Spivak is particularly concerned with characterizing the “subaltern,” which is a person of marginalized status who is also provided with no voice, and she characterizes the silencing of the subaltern class as doing epistemic violence to them by removing their ability to speak for themselves on every …

What is epistemic ambivalence?

Epistemic ambivalence is when you may know the truth of a situation but cannot say which truth it is, because there is more than one option.

Who coined the term subaltern?

Antonio Gramsci coined the term subaltern to identify the cultural hegemony that excludes and displaces specific people and social groups from the socio-economic institutions of society, in order to deny their agency and voices in colonial politics.

What subaltern means?

subaltern. noun. Definition of subaltern (Entry 2 of 2) 1 : a person holding a subordinate position specifically : a junior officer (as in the British army) 2 : a particular proposition that follows immediately from a universal.

What is epistemic ambiguity?

Epistemic ambiguity may be intentional—states do not know exactly the nature of the task so delegate to an expert—or unintentional—they are vague in delegation and unaware of this. The common result is that international organizations have some autonomy in implementation of this task.

What is an ontological truth?

The correspondence theory of truth is at its core an ontological thesis: a belief is true if there exists an appropriate entity – a fact – to which it corresponds. If there is no such entity, the belief is false. Facts, for the neo-classical correspondence theory, are entities in their own right.