Was the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan justified essay?
Truman’s original choice to drop the atomic bomb was justified, however dropping the second one was not right. Before Little Boy, the US gave a warning to Japan that an attack was eminent and it warned the Japanese government to surrender. But in the Fat Man bombing, it was dropped just a few days later.
Why was the US justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
What justifications were given for America’s use of the atomic bomb on Japan?
REASONS IN FAVOR OF THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF JAPANIt led to a quick end to World War II.It saved the lives of American soldiers.It potentially saved the lives of Japanese soldiers and civilians.It forced Japan to surrender, which it appeared unwilling to do.It was revenge for Japan’s attack at Pearl Harbor.It matched the brutality that Japan used during the war.
What were the reasons the bomb should not have been used on Japan?
The reason japan should not have been bombed is because many civilian lives were taken who had nothing to do with the war. The U.S. dropping the bomb on japan killed many people and left their land in shambles.
Why the atomic bomb was not justified?
First, some historians argue that the atomic bombing of Japan was not justified because they consider the use of the bombs to be inhumane. In general, bombs of any sort are devastating and can cause widespread damage and death. Therefore, it has been argued that the bombs were inhumane and should not have been used.
What would have happened if America didn’t bomb Japan?
There’s a belief that the United States didn’t have to drop the atomic bombs to win the war. The result would lead to many more casualties for both the Allies and Japan, possibly even surpassing the over 200,000 civilians who perished from the bombs.
What would have happened if Japan didn’t surrender?
If Japan didn’t surrender after the second atom bomb do we know the next potential plan? (e.g. another bomb, an invasion, etc.) However the assumption from within the military was that if Japan did not accept unconditional surrender soon, it would be likely that atomic bombing would resume.
Was dropping the atomic bomb a war crime?
His definition of democide includes not only genocide, but also an excessive killing of civilians in war, to the extent this is against the agreed rules for warfare; he argues the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes, and thus democide.
What were the main arguments for and against dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?
Supporters of the bombings generally believe that they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland, saving more lives than they took by doing so. Opponents contend, among other arguments, that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war or that they constituted a war crime or genocide.
Did Japan deserve the nukes?
Gynne. No, the Japanese did not deserve what they got in the end. The Japanese who died due to the atomic bomb attacks were civilians and completely innocent, yet they had to pay with their lives due to the cruelty of their emperor.
Why did America go to war with Japan?
On Decem, the United States Congress declared war ( Pub. L. 77–328, 55 Stat. 795) on the Empire of Japan in response to that country’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor the prior day.
Why did they bomb Hiroshima and not Tokyo?
The U.S. likely did not target Tokyo for the atomic bomb strikes as it was the seat of the Emperor and the location of much of the high ranking military officers. The U.S. decided to drop the bombs onto military industrial targets and centers that had significant military utility such as ports and airfields.