How many seats does the ATR 72 have?

ATR 72/Number of seats

Does ATR 72 board from front or back?

In the majority of configurations, passengers board the ATR 72 using the rear door, a relatively unusual configuration for a passenger aircraft, while the front door is typically used for the loading and unloading of cargo; early customer Finnair intentionally ordered its ATR 72s with a front passenger door so that it …

How much runway does an ATR 72 need?

The ATR 72-600 requires an airfield that is 1333 m for take off. It also requires a landing field that is 914 m long.

What aircraft is an ATR 72?

The ATR 72 is one of a family of twin-turboprop passenger and freighter aircraft developed and manufactured by Avions de Transport Regional (ATR). ATR, with its headquarters in Toulouse, is a joint venture company between EADS and Finmeccanica / Alenia Aeronautica.

How safe is ATR 72?

The ATR 72 worldwide does not have a great safety record, the recent Transasia crashes being examples. However, Jet Airways overall safety record is very good, so I would not worry. The probability of a plane crash (even on an ATR 72) is significantly less than a road accident on the streets of Calcutta.

Are prop planes safer than jets?

Both turboprops and jets are powered by turbine engines, so they are essentially the same thing and thus, are considered to be equally as safe. Because of the drag propellers cause, they actually allow the aircraft to stop much more quickly than a jet.

Is ATR owned by Airbus?

ATR is a joint partnership between two major European aeronautics players, Airbus and Leonardo.

What plane needs the shortest runway?

The Embraer E170 needs 1,644m (5,394 ft), while the competitive Airbus A220-100 only requires a runway of 1,463 m (4,800 ft). Of jet aircraft, the Airbus A220-100 takes the cake with the shortest takeoff distance.

Is ATR a good aircraft?

According to ATR’s website, the ATR 72 is 39% more efficient in fuel burn over 300 nautical miles. We could conclude that the ATR 72 is far more fuel-efficient than the Q400, but the Q400 carries more passengers. On a fuel burn per seat basis over the same distance, the Q400 comes out 8% ahead.

Is ATR difficult to fly?

On a sector that takes 2 hours for the ATR 72 to fly, the Q400 can easily fly in under 1 hour 40 minutes, slower than a jet by only around 15 minutes. While the ATR 72 struggles to climb to its service ceiling of 25,000ft (FL250), the Q400 reaches this altitude in minutes.

What does ATR aircraft stand for?

Regional Transport Airplanes
ATR (Aerei da Trasporto Regionale or Avions de transport régional; Regional Transport Airplanes in English) is a Franco-Italian aircraft manufacturer headquartered on the grounds of Toulouse Blagnac International Airport in Blagnac, France.

Are single prop planes safe?

Flying a single engine airplane is more dangerous than ‘driving to the airport’. Flying in a small aircraft is far more dangerous than other methods of transportation (see statistics in other answers). I would not recommend it unless you have a positive reason to use a small plane.

Is the ATR 72 assembled on the same line?

Since the ATR 72 is assembled on the same production line as the smaller ATR 42, along with sharing the majority of subsystems, components, and manufacturing techniques, the two types support each other to remain in production.

Where to sit on Air France ATR 72-600?

HOP! operates the ATR 72-600 on short-haul flights, on behalf of Air France. This aircraft offers a 2-2 configuration of all Economy leather seats. The front of the aircraft might be loud. For a quieter ride, sit further back in the aircraft. The entrance door is located at the back of the aircraft.

Which is the best airline to fly with ATR 72?

1 Wings Air (Lion Group): 64 2 Azul Brazilian Airlines: 33 3 Air New Zealand: 29 4 IndiGo: 23 5 Firefly: 20 6 Cebgo: 19 7 Binter Canarias: 20 8 ASL Airlines Ireland: 18 9 Alliance Air (Air India): 18 10 Air Algérie: 15

Why was bleed air eliminated from the ATR 72?

ATR’s senior vice-president for engineering Alessandro Amendola indicated that the elimination of all uses of bleed air was a key aim in the designing of an all-electric architecture as well as improving engine efficiency; the minimising of peak electrical loads was also a stated priority.